PowerUp!: A tool for calculating Minimum detectable effect sizes and minimum required sample sizes for experimental and quasi-experimental designs
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper complements existing power analysis tools by offering tools to compute minimum detectable effect sizes (MDES) for existing studies and to estimate minimum required sample sizes (MRSS) for studies under design. The tools that accompany this paper support estimates of MDES or MSSR for 21 different study designs that include 14 random assignment designs (6 designs in which individuals are randomly assigned to treatment or control condition and 8 in which clusters of individuals are randomly assigned to condition, with models differing depending on whether the sample was blocked prior to random assignment and by whether the analytic models assume constant, fixed, or random effects across blocks or assignment clusters); and 7 quasi-experimental designs (an interrupted time series design and 6 regression discontinuity designs that vary depending on whether the sample was blocked prior to randomization, whether individuals or clusters of individuals are assigned to treatment or control condition, and whether the analytic models assume fixed or random effects).
منابع مشابه
PowerUp!: A Tool for Calculating Minimum Detectable Effect Sizes and Minimum Required Sample Sizes for Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Design Studies
This paper complements existing power analysis tools by offering tools to compute minimum detectable effect sizes (MDES) for existing studies and to estimate minimum required sample sizes (MRSS) for studies under design. The tools that accompany this paper support estimates of MDES or MSSR for 21 different study designs that include 14 random assignment designs (6 designs in which individuals a...
متن کاملStatistical Sensitiveness for Science
Research often necessitates of samples, yet obtaining large enough samples is not always possible. When it is, the researcher may use one of two methods for deciding upon the required sample size: rules-of-thumb, quick yet uncertain, and estimations for power, mathematically precise yet with the potential to overestimate or underestimate sample sizes when effect sizes are unknown. Misestimated ...
متن کاملComparing Estimates to Guessing 1 Running head: Comparing Estimates to Guessing Comparing the Accuracy of Experimental Estimates to Guessing: A New Perspective on Replication and the “Crisis of Confidence” in Psychology
We develop a general measure of estimation accuracy for fundamental research designs called v. The v measure compares the estimation accuracy of the ubiquitous Ordinary Least Squares estimator, which includes sample means as a special case, to a benchmark estimator which randomizes the direction of treatment effects. For sample and effect sizes common to experimental psychology, v suggests that...
متن کاملCalculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs
Effect sizes are the most important outcome of empirical studies. Most articles on effect sizes highlight their importance to communicate the practical significance of results. For scientists themselves, effect sizes are most useful because they facilitate cumulative science. Effect sizes can be used to determine the sample size for follow-up studies, or examining effects across studies. This a...
متن کاملEffect of CO2 Concentration in Injecting Gas on Minimum Miscibility Pressure: Compositional Model and Experimental Study
For technical and economic success of miscible gas injection projects, an accurate laboratory measurement of Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) at reservoir conditions is essential. On the other hand, compositional reservoir simulator is a useful tool in gas injection studies and prediction of MMP. The main goal of this paper is to describe a procedure to generate a three phase sequential t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016